Professional Standards Passport Vs Click-Through Training
Why the Professional Standards Passport Works Better Than Click-Through Training Most practices now
Read More
When disgruntled staff make false accusations
Using our system as part of your defence in a CQC investigation Case Study: False claims by disgr
Read More
How often do CQC related regulations change
When it comes to compliance, many practices feel under pressure to keep updating their polic
Read More
How many policies do you need for CQC
This depends on the size of your organisation and the purpose of your policies.This is what yo
Read More
CQC Requests for a re-inspection
   How do you overturn a poor rating? When Providers get a poor rating, most will
Read More
Single Assessment Framework – Transparency and data accuracy (Part 1)
Differentiate data between old KLOEs Vs New Single Assessment Framework The “Publication date”
Read More
Single Assessment Framework – Transparency and data accuracy (Part 2)
CQC Inspections Inspections dates have become corrupted The “Publication date” was originally d
Read More
Single Assessment Framework - Misleading evidence ratings
Misleading ratings on CQC site During this transition to the new Single Assessment Framework (SAF),
Read More
Reinspection after improved rating
Formal CQC process for managing requests for a re-inspection We have recently received the followin
Read More
Case Study: Instantly in Special Measures
How these providers failed at everything all at once We looked at two particular inspection failure
Read More
Clinical Audits
Apps for a robust Clinical Audits System. A Clinical Audit System should comprise two elements:-
Read More
IPC Risk Assessed in ONE Day
IPC Risk Assessed in ONE Day 98% NHS England audit score 1.      &nb
Read More
Investment and Impact Fund – NHS England
Case Study: Investment and Impact Fund – NHS England Turning a Simple Spreadsheet into a £20,00
Read More
Transition period from KLOEs to Single Assessment Framework
Single Assessment Framework: Quality Statements and Key Lines Vs Enquiry (KLOEs) Is there a transit
Read More
NHS Digital - Quality Assurance Through Automation
  Project for a unique automation solution for Practice Management Project initiate
Read More

Single Assessment Framework - Misleading evidence ratings

Misleading ratings on CQC site

During this transition to the new Single Assessment Framework (SAF), the public facing web site will show a range of “hybrid inspections” ranging from an old KLOE based inspections to partial application of the SAF to a full SAF based inspection. For the data to be meaningful and transparent, it is important that the Public have a clear and easily digestible picture of the level of checks and the exact dates these were carried out.

EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THE ISSUE:
In total, the SAF has 34 Quality Statements with 6 Evidence Categories each, giving a grand total of 204 potential measuring points for a full assessment or inspection.

From a recent live example on the CQC web site:
When a single Key Question “equity of access” is reviewed via a telephone interview, the remaining 203 evidence category are scored and updated to the latest SAF formulas based purely on the previous rating.

The date of the latest assessment is displayed at the top on the main page and on each Domain page to inform the Public about the age and reliability of this report and assessment.

THE ISSUE
The information displayed omits the critical facts that:-
1. only ONE Evidence Category out of 204 was checked
2. that the latest assessment represents 0.5% of the potential items that could be checked
3. that 99.5% of the updated items are from a real site-inspection
4. that the evidence for the 99.5% updated items is in actuality 5 years out of date.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST
Please provide details of what steps the CQC has taken to address this anomaly so that the public is assured of transparent and easily understood information regarding:-
1. the number of Evidence Categories that were reviewed
2. the date/age of each review
3. differentiating evidence obtained at actual site-inspections


CQC Response

In accordance with section 1(1) of FOIA we are able to confirm that CQC does hold recorded information in relation to this matter.
CQC does not display scoring information down to the evidence category level on our website.
We are currently working on finalising the automation of our publication and will then be delivering design improvements to our reports on the website. This improvement work is currently scheduled to start at the end of October.


Editor's comments

CQC did not address the issue and did not suply the information awaiting improvements in October 2024

Following this request, the CQC scrapped the Evidence Ratings altogether

Link: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/single_assessment_framework_prov#outgoing-1734540

 

 

CQC

 



×

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Register Now